<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Krunker - Latest Comments in The remote controlled WowWee Spyball @ CES 2009</title><link>http://krunker.disqus.com/</link><description>Krunker aims to deliver the latest news and announcements in consumer electronics and technology</description><atom:link href="https://krunker.disqus.com/the_remote_controlled_wowwee_spyball_ces_2009/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:20:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The remote controlled WowWee Spyball @ CES 2009</title><link>http://www.krunker.com/2009/01/12/the-remote-controlled-wowwee-spyball-ces-2009/#comment-5104017</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah I would agree there too. The price point for this device (which I think was around $150 or so) would lend it to being more of a recreational device than anything else. Yet, it should still be a fun device to have it works well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">krunker</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:20:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The remote controlled WowWee Spyball @ CES 2009</title><link>http://www.krunker.com/2009/01/12/the-remote-controlled-wowwee-spyball-ces-2009/#comment-5098588</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The specs and form make it seem more of a "toy" than an actual "spy" device, but that doesn't mean it wouldn't be fun for some to roll around the house.  I just don't think that you're going to be doing any covert work with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Electronic Gadgets</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:08:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>