<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Krunker - Latest Comments in Sony HDR-FX7 High Definition Handycam Review</title><link>http://krunker.disqus.com/</link><description>Krunker aims to deliver the latest news and announcements in consumer electronics and technology</description><atom:link href="https://krunker.disqus.com/sony_hdr_fx7_high_definition_handycam_review/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:04:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Sony HDR-FX7 High Definition Handycam Review</title><link>http://www.krunker.com/2006/12/27/sony-hdr-fx7-high-definition-handycam-review/#comment-23444368</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I would think that on this caliber of camer, that sony would have made the still images a higher megapixel (They are just over 1 megapixel). I would have paid a additional fair amount to have a higher megapixel amount. One of the reasons that I chose this camera was so that I did not have to lug around my still camera, and a video camera. I still have to do that, because I would be embarrased for anyone to see the still images that the FX7 takes, after I spent $3,500.00 on it! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dsi r4</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:04:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>